•  

    Click HERE to join our forum and participate in the discussions.

     

Brake reservoir leak


tidmarshsmiths5

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
159
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
South Carolina
Vehicle Year
1985
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.8l stock
In my 1985 Bronco II brake fluid reservoir, the 1st reservoir (the smaller one) was completely empty today - it was full a month ago, but when my pedal was a little mushy, I knew that I was low.

I've not had any puddles under it - any idea what would have caused this?

I filled it, looking for leaks but have found none so far. Just odd...
 


adsm08

New member
Ford Technician
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Location
Northumberland, PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Wheel cylinders.

The front reservior feeds the rear brakes, so pop the drums off and have a look.
 

tidmarshsmiths5

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
159
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
South Carolina
Vehicle Year
1985
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.8l stock
Thanks! that's what I needed to know.

I'll pop them off after I finish putting the hitch on...I'll take a picture or 2.

So far, no leaks this AM - hauled a load of tree to the landfill - maybe 800lbs in the trailer.

Never leaked before I started hauling that tree I cut down to the landfill.

May be a good time to re-do the back brakes. Thanks for the info!
 

adsm08

New member
Ford Technician
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Location
Northumberland, PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Yeah, if I am right you will need new brakes anyway. You can get the brake fluid out of the friction material by soaking them in denatured alcohol, but that dries them out really bad and they start cracking and coming apart soon after.

I did that once years ago when I was flat broke and the Ranger was my only vehicle. It got me through to the next safety inspection, but I got failed there for the disintegrating brake shoes.
 

Mark_88

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
68
Location
Uxbridge, Ontario
Vehicle Year
1988
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.3 Carbureted
Hmmmm...is the dual reservoir a better setup than the single? I blew out the driver side rear cylinder and it ended up draining the whole reservoir...almost left me with no brakes.

Just wondering because if I need to change the master some day I might look into that setup as an alternative...

But I now carry a line plug (or two) for these types of emergencies...gets me home so I can work on things without having to tow the truck...
 

tidmarshsmiths5

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
159
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
South Carolina
Vehicle Year
1985
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.8l stock
...I'm no engineer, but the 2 reservoir system is genius to me.

As far as leaks, looks like one night this week I'll start re-building the back brakes. It's the driver side wheel cylinder...leaky leaky...figure since I'll have it apart, I'll go ahead and replace the shoes, have the drums turned and clean it all up. As you can see...there isn't a lot of shoe left...as a matter of fact...if any in some parts...it's got 137k on it and they look to be original so after 28 years, who can complain!

It's a very slow leak and usually only after I've driven across the pasture or drove over 80 miles. Either way, it's a leak and I hate leaks.

The front ones were re-built when I bought it and they're in great shape.

Figure, I'll go get me a better jack (one that isn't so darn flimsy) and replace the shocks while there...I'll have the wheels off anyway. They look original as well - the guy that sold it to me said no way, but if I was a betting man I'd say "WAY".

 
Last edited:

Mark_88

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
68
Location
Uxbridge, Ontario
Vehicle Year
1988
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.3 Carbureted
I just did my driver side wheel cylinder and thought I could do it without fully removing the shoes...got it in OK and back together...only to have my parking brake pull out...so I guess I'm going to have to pull it all apart...

A bit of advice though...check that the bleeder valve is free before installing the cylinder...after putting mine on I found the bleeder, though new looking, would not turn with the brake line wrench...kept sliding and figured it would eventually just strip the head on it...so it has to come off again either way...just something I didn't check before going ahead with the replacement...
 

tidmarshsmiths5

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
159
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
South Carolina
Vehicle Year
1985
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.8l stock
Replaced the wheel cylinders, shoes, srings, etc. Everything back together, no parking brake. Odd, it should be harder as the shoes were new so I took it back apart. Everything looked fine (that Haynes manual is a joke). Drove it 55 miles not a problem; driving home and it went kapow...seems like the bottom spring that holds the adjuster came off and released the adjuster. Long story short, it looks like the spring I put in at the bottom I needed to twist it and put it so that it has better tension. Fixed all this and now the parking brake was back to working. Let's hope that I did it right this time.
 

adsm08

New member
Ford Technician
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Location
Northumberland, PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
I spent a year fighting with a similar issue to finally figure out I had the shoes on backwards.

The long thing one goes to the front and the thick short one goes to the rear. Having them installed backwards will cause the parking brake to not hold, the lower spring and adjuster to fall out, and then the brakes to not operate correctly.
 

tidmarshsmiths5

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
159
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
South Carolina
Vehicle Year
1985
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.8l stock
I spent a year fighting with a similar issue to finally figure out I had the shoes on backwards.

The long thing one goes to the front and the thick short one goes to the rear. Having them installed backwards will cause the parking brake to not hold, the lower spring and adjuster to fall out, and then the brakes to not operate correctly.


This is how it looks on (new shoes)...I thought I matched it up the way I took them off...now I'll have to go check again.

Looking at the pic the left side of the pic if you're looking at it is the front of the vehicle.

here's another pic of when I had it all apart...



Pics from the manual:


 
Last edited:

tidmarshsmiths5

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
159
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
South Carolina
Vehicle Year
1985
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.8l stock
Cable inside brake broke last night...the one that hooks to the top and then to the bottom around the guide...geeze lou-wheeze!:annoyed:

QUESTION:

I'm going to replace driver side rear brake cable, but while I have it off:

Is the shoe facing the front of the vehicle the short one?

OR

Is the shoe facing the front of the vehicle the long one?
 

Tedybear

New member
Firefighter
Joined
Aug 26, 2008
Messages
0
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Vehicle Year
1989, 2001
Vehicle
1989=Bronco II
Engine Size
2.9 V6
The smaller shoe should go on the front. The larger shoe should go to the rear, but not because of why you might think!

When the brakes are applied the front shoe tries to jam itself into the brake drum. It is that front cohesive part that has the strongest braking force - pressing most-so upon the forward-facing shoe. However, even though the front shoe is where the majority of braking force is applied, it does not get the larger shoe!

As noted, in a braking mode, the majority of the force that the decelerating vehicle applies to the brake shoes is applied against the forward shoe by the forward-most area of the inner brake drum, this makes the forward shoe the stronger, braking-wise. To help even things out, the rear secondary shoe is designed to be larger, to more equally match the braking power of the smaller, but more powerful front primary shoe.

Ergo: The proper place for the larger shoe is to the rear.
I ran into this problem when I had "PoopBoys" do the rear brakes on one of the company vans I used to drive. At first the "Tech" tried to put the short shoes on the same side, and the long shoes on the other side. I told him that was incorrect and he got pissed. He then checked the side he didn't pull apart yet? And sure enough, the short shoe was on the front, and the long shoe on the back.

S-
 

tidmarshsmiths5

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
159
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
South Carolina
Vehicle Year
1985
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.8l stock
I ran into this problem when I had "PoopBoys" do the rear brakes on one of the company vans I used to drive. At first the "Tech" tried to put the short shoes on the same side, and the long shoes on the other side. I told him that was incorrect and he got pissed. He then checked the side he didn't pull apart yet? And sure enough, the short shoe was on the front, and the long shoe on the back.

S-
Thank you! I stopped by and talked to a brake specialist today...I have them on correctly and your information is exactly correct. I took both sides off and showed him the pic of what I have and he said they looked good.

Now, if I can get that #@@#@#$ parking brake to work...2 things I know need some help...1)Cable is screwy...don't know how yet/why but it is screwy and not secured to side of chassis like I found a pic of on internet and 2)I'm not sure the adjustment is correct...the guy today told me that it looked loose and all I needed to do is tighten it, but I know something is either missing or amiss...I'll keep plugging away until I get the parking brake to hold the vehicle...

If not, I'm going to pay someone to fix it because it is driving me insane!
 

Mark_88

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
68
Location
Uxbridge, Ontario
Vehicle Year
1988
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.3 Carbureted
When I was doing my brakes (about 2 years ago) I posted asking for someone to post a pic of the connection where the two parking brake cables connect to the single line running to the pedal...nobody actually replied to that...anyway...the problem could be the way that connection works.

Mine is now so rusty (gee, what a surprise) that I may have to actually change both parking brake cables to get it to work properly. I couldn't find an image on line that showed how this should be connected but my PB actually worked for a long time (perfectly, I might add)...
 

Mark_88

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
68
Location
Uxbridge, Ontario
Vehicle Year
1988
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.3 Carbureted
Thanks much...that actually shows what I am missing on mine!

The little attachment on the end of the cable from the pedal...I don't have one that I can recall...but now I am going to go out and have a look to see how I messed that up...:)
 

tidmarshsmiths5

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
159
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
South Carolina
Vehicle Year
1985
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.8l stock
After having a shop "repair" my parking brake (and they really are a good honest shop), I am having adjuster fall out problems...I am looking at my old pics again to make sure I put that spring on the bottom on correctly. I don't understand why it has come off more than once now. I am now going to have to go get the drum turned because after 38 miles of scrub a dubbing going down the road, the adjuster and spring made some nice grooves in them. I am so pissed...but not the end of the world...I will fix it...
 

tidmarshsmiths5

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
159
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
South Carolina
Vehicle Year
1985
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.8l stock
Think the way that bottom spring goes in is my issue...gonna try it a different way...









 
Last edited:

tidmarshsmiths5

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
159
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
South Carolina
Vehicle Year
1985
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.8l stock
Here's the issue: the bottom spring I know is the root cause.

I tried it one way - came out (only thing I can think of is to push it around until the "hump" is situated in the hole but when I try this it pulls the adjuster at such an angle that it doesn't touch.

If I put it on backwards, it puts the adjuster in place where it clicks as it moves but I still don't think it's right.

Put it back together this way and drove it and so far it works, but how good I just don't know.



here's my drum now it has a couple of nice grooves in it
 

Top