•  

    Click HERE to join our forum and participate in the discussions.

     

Is a SAS the only option?


Sapper6

New member
Joined
Nov 7, 2010
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Vehicle Year
99
Vehicle
Ford
It was a very well written post. I will only toss a small bit of my cents into the pot. If you are going to run a non bead locked or non aired down high traction tire than by all means keep the IFS and with some small work you will have a competent comfortable light trail and DD.

But if you are going to go to a str8 axle and spend the time and money on parts why would you pass up the strength and piece of mind having a 1 ton axle? Hell you can find paired ton axles out of CUCV for as low as 500 a pair. Thats a D60 front and 14B w locker rear with 4.10s.

In my humble opinion bypass the D44 all together and go str8 to a D60. Pay once and never have to worry about larger tires or adding a V8.
 


bilzy7

New member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Sep 13, 2010
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Lynn, MA
Vehicle Year
1998
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0 SOHC
So with a 99 4x4, I'm trying to research what I can do to front. I'm gonna read up on the ways to add more wheel travel but I'm tryin to add like 3-4 to front only. Anyone know where specs for front end conversions or ways to "mod" a 99 might be? I'm trying not to blow my whole 3k I got left on front end suspension. If you do thanks, I've gotten like no responses for some insight. Other then go buy a 97... Lol
 

77ford

New member
Joined
Jan 25, 2011
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Points
0
If you have an off road only rig does the issues with the steering alignment come into play? I've heard different opinion on weather the "bump steering" issues can effect traction.

I've got a BRII with about 4" of suspension lift and 4" of body lift. I know when I'm doing hill climbs it seems like I work the steering more than the people with SAS.

On a second note, what locker is the best fit for the TTB setup? Right now I'm welded (bought it that way) and I don't like the way it binds up when turning. I just know it's going to break something at anytime.
 

59bisquik

April 2011 OTOTM Winner
Solid Axle Swap
Joined
Apr 3, 2008
Messages
115
Reaction score
2
Points
18
Age
49
Location
Barstow, CA
Vehicle Year
1986
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
If you have an off road only rig does the issues with the steering alignment come into play? I've heard different opinion on weather the "bump steering" issues can effect traction.
When I first setup my SAS I had the trackbar angle wrong and had some bumpsteer. Offroad, it was not noticable but highway speeds was another story all together.
On a second note, what locker is the best fit for the TTB setup? Right now I'm welded (bought it that way) and I don't like the way it binds up when turning. I just know it's going to break something at anytime.
When I ran TTB, I had an Auburn ECTED electric locker. It was horrible and never actually locked, basically just a limited slip. Not a recommended product. I now run a SAS and use a Lockrite. Pros: Locks every time, bullet proof, reliable and easy. Cons: In heavy rocks or slabs like Moab or parts of the Rubicon, it doesnt seem to unlock and feels like a spool. Its better than a welded unit since it does unlock occasionally. Overall, I am happy with it.

While I wont get into which is better...TTB vs SAS since I like both. SAS does have an advantage of a better aftermarket. While you can get custom chromo axles and joints etc for a TTB, they are spendy and special order. The SAS axles on the other hand are normally on the shelf and thus less expensive and easier to get.
 
Last edited:

4x4junkie

Mall-Rated
Forum Moderator
Joined
Aug 19, 2001
Messages
0
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Location
So. Calif (SFV)
Vehicle Year
1990,1994
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.9L, 4.0L
If you have an off road only rig does the issues with the steering alignment come into play? I've heard different opinion on weather the "bump steering" issues can effect traction.

I've got a BRII with about 4" of suspension lift and 4" of body lift. I know when I'm doing hill climbs it seems like I work the steering more than the people with SAS.
If your steering linkage isn't aligned well (is out of phase) with your beams, the bumpsteer will for sure force you to make corrections, especially on a steep hillclimb where weight-shift causes the suspension to unload some (pulling the tires toed-in). If real bad, it'll affect traction too, yes (the tires are pushing & fighting each other for the direction they want to take the frontend of your rig).

I definitely would suggest taking some corrective action on it, especially since you are noticing the effects of it.
A steering option I don't think was mentioned yet in this post is Stonecrusher's setup. There's been some discussion on it recently in the Fabrication forum (I think it was) here (also search the Steering section too). Simple, a bit crude (IMO), but very effective setup. Stonecrusher only offers the setup with heim ends, though several users here have replicated it using standard tierod ends.
 

84EB

New member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Manchester, Tn
Vehicle Year
1984
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
5.0
What I would like to see is someone try to link a TTB instead of radius arms. I hate radius arms.
 

Mutant Pony

New member
Solid Axle Swap
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
58
Location
Hersey, Mi
Vehicle Year
1977
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2300
I would like to add: It depends on what you do, primarily, offroad.
Rock crawling: A heavier duty front end is required as well as the straight axle just plain works better.
Mud bogging: Although the ttb may gain a traction advantage in 'the rough', it becomes a wall in deep mud. The round tube of the straight axle doesn't.
If all you do is trail ride, The TTB is a FAR better front axle!! The independent suspension provides a better contact patch then a straight axle is capable of. The main benefit being that niether side is affected by the other.
Dunes, sand: definatly the TTB!!
 

84EB

New member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Manchester, Tn
Vehicle Year
1984
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
5.0
If all you do is trail ride, The TTB is a FAR better front axle!! The independent suspension provides a better contact patch then a straight axle is capable of. The main benefit being that niether side is affected by the other.
Please explain. The wheels on a TTB travel in an arch when moving up and down. May be a little different than a straight axle, but I just don't see it being enough to make a difference.
 

Mutant Pony

New member
Solid Axle Swap
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
58
Location
Hersey, Mi
Vehicle Year
1977
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2300
True, the contact patch benefit of a ttb over a straight axle is small. As I said, the main benefit being the separation of sides which improves ride more than anything.
If you like being beat to death by your truck, the straight axle is for you!!!
I have both. My poor old '84 doesn't get driven much. With a much bigger motor and much more aggresive tires the only place it has an advantage over my '86 is in the mud.
 

legoms013

09/2013 OTOTM
Article Contributor
Solid Axle Swap
Joined
Apr 7, 2008
Messages
0
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
CA
Vehicle Year
1996
Vehicle
Ford Ranger
Engine Size
4.0L V6
Please explain. The wheels on a TTB travel in an arch when moving up and down. May be a little different than a straight axle, but I just don't see it being enough to make a difference.
I'm with this guy.

Contact patch is determined by tire size, not axle type.
 

84EB

New member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Manchester, Tn
Vehicle Year
1984
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
5.0
Not trying to be argumentative, but a SAS rig doesnt have to beat you to death. My SAS'ed BII rides nice and smooth. Get lots of compliments from passengers on how nice it rides.

But we are getting a little off-topic here.
I would still like to see someone ditch the radius arms and link a TTB
 

Sasquatch_Ryda

Coast Mountain Crawlers
Supporting Member
Ford Technician
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Age
36
Location
Terrace, BC, Canada
Vehicle Year
1991/2002/2008
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L/4.0L/6.4L
Gwaii has done a parallel 4 link with TTB already.....theres pics of it floating around here somewhere.
 

84EB

New member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Manchester, Tn
Vehicle Year
1984
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
5.0
Thanks, I'll look for it
 

simonsays

October 2010 OTOTM Winner
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Mar 9, 2009
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Carpinteria
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
5.0
I hate to burst everyones bubbles but they have been doing 4 linked Ttb for a while, one of the old rough riders race trucks were done that way back in the 80s-90s.

I have a dezert race truck that uses Ttb, I just built really long radius arms so I don't get much caster change

sent by another dumbass using Tapatalk.
 

84EB

New member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Manchester, Tn
Vehicle Year
1984
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
5.0
Your not bursting my bubble, I would just like to see them. Haven't turned anything up but a couple pics of gwaii's.
 

Mutant Pony

New member
Solid Axle Swap
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
58
Location
Hersey, Mi
Vehicle Year
1977
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2300
No matter how nice and smooth your straight axle rides, both tires are still connected together. There is a reason why trophy trucks don't have straight axles. With an independent front, one tire can be bouncing all over like crazy and the other tire can be tracking perfectly. Not so with the straight axle. Any thing that effects one tire effects both! At speed it can have a devistating effect.
 

84EB

New member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Oct 20, 2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Manchester, Tn
Vehicle Year
1984
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
5.0
Trophy Trucks? WTH, I thought we were talking about trail riding, rock crawling, etc with our RBVs; not racing trophy trucks
 

scooter

October OTOTM Winner
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Oct 24, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
5
Points
0
Location
N.W. Oklahoma
Vehicle Year
1989
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
5.0L
in my situation a stright axle is not realistic as my max tire size will be a 35 and as of now until i can afford something else its my dd.
So if money was not a option, what would you have?
A built chromo d-60 running 40+ tires, coilivers, fourlinked bla bla bla.
Or still running a TTB?
Be honest now.

For most its not a matter of which one is better, its a matter of overall cost, space, time ect ect.


Todd S.
 

Top