Recent content by 85DANGERanger

and honestly, i wouldnt go any bigger then 33's on are weak d28 front axles, they break pretty easy.

31's would be good 32's might be a little tight.

anyone know length of rear driveshaft??

my bad, i meant to put a comma after believe. i wasnt for sure about having the FM146 trans. but im refering to the rear drivshaft.

anyone know the length of the driveshaft??? i have the FM146 trans. i believe, with a manual T-case.

yeah, those shafts suck, what was ford smoking when the drew up the blue prints for that driveshaft? horrible design..

did you try putting it in netrual when you try to put it into 4 low?? on my chevy you have to do that..

is it the same amount of work practically?? no exactly a bolt in like a D35 would be??

i hate how cars look when there put on a 4x4 chassis. all you see is frame. it might be able to be pulled off good if someone took the time and money to channel the frame so the body would actually sit the frame. everyone ive ever seen looks like people take the easy way out and just get a big...

hate to correct you, but thats actually a 73' corvette. 73' was the only year the vette had a metal rear bumper and a fiberglass front nose. before 73' the vettes had metal front and rear bumpers and after 73' they got rid of the metal rear bumper for the fiberglass. thought this would be some...

i thought so, the guy i got the bronco off of said that the ranger fenders were a inch longer, but when i was browsing a junkyard today, i could of sworn they looked totally i dentical. good, now i can quit searching for a 89'-90 B2 and just get a ranger fender.

are the fenders the same on a 89-90 ranger as a 89'-90 bronco II ??? will they bolt up the same between vehicles??

the doors arnt different?? im thinkin there more square on a 89'-up, which means 89' fenders wouldnt work with the 88- earlier doors..

f**king nasty ass bronco!!! you definetly inspired me. i got plans now.

ok, doesnt sound as bad as i thought. i might just do this swap.