•  

    Click HERE to join our forum and participate in the discussions.

     

2.3 in a B2? Anyone done this?


Roger

New member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Tooele, UT
Vehicle Year
1990
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
I have a 90 Ranger with 2.3 and 5 speed. Its likely going to be swapped out for a Explorer 4.0 and A4LD. Has anyone put a 2.3 in a B2? I don't need it as a trail monster, or a speed demon. Looking to chop the top and make it a nice weather cruiser.
 


disciplerocks

July 2011 OTOTM Winner
Solid Axle Swap
Joined
May 27, 2010
Messages
1,257
Reaction score
7
Points
0
Location
Evansville, IN
Vehicle Year
1989
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Why would you want to put an underpowered motor in a heavier truck? Not to mention the 2.9 is under powered for the B2 as it is.
 

Beanmachine7000

New member
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Tennessee
Vehicle Year
1991
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Why would you want to put an underpowered motor in a heavier truck? Not to mention the 2.9 is under powered for the B2 as it is.
I almost did it once... Gave up on finding A 2.3 4X4 trans and scrapped it...
 

mp3deviant721

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2009
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Eau Claire, WI
Vehicle Year
1995
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.3l of fury
I've seen people talk about it but no one who actually did it. Unless you want to be the first one.
 

PetesPonies

Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2008
Messages
654
Reaction score
6
Points
18
Location
east coast
Vehicle Year
1984
Vehicle
Bronco II
A FI 2.3 wouldn't be crazy. I like the 2.3 in my Ranger for what I use that vehicle for. A FI 2.3 would be more road worthy than a carbed 2.8, promise you that.
 

CHKNFKR

New member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Jun 18, 2009
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Illinois
Vehicle Year
1993
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
545 CID
A FI 2.3 wouldn't be crazy. I like the 2.3 in my Ranger for what I use that vehicle for. A FI 2.3 would be more road worthy than a carbed 2.8, promise you that.
This

My ranger started out as a 2.3 5speed 4x4 and it never had any troubles (or so I'm told.) It got good mileage, could break traction if so desired all while running 33s and 4.10s no less. A doubler would have made it a far more capable wheeler for sure.
 

Roger

New member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Tooele, UT
Vehicle Year
1990
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.3
Bringing this thread back from the dead. I recently found a 84 B2 without engine and trans, owner was planning a V8 swap and ran out of patience... Last summe, my son and I stripped the 90 Ranger and installed EVERYTHING from his 94 Explorer. Fun truck, and does get a little better MPG than in the Explorer. But I'm left with the leftover stuff.

I have a couple ways to go with this, *IF* I get the truck. I'm not looking for a overgrown underpowered offroader. I'm thinking a decent little normal sized MPG machine. I remember thinking the B2 needed mroe power with the 2.9 in 86 when I wanted to buy one. And with the automatic, it wasn't a lot of fun. The 4 banger EFI with a 5 speed ought to at least be its equal.

I'm understanding the B2 engine crossmember isn't drilled for 2.3 mounts. Not a show stopper, I can always build mounts. While I have the electric shift tcase, I also have a manual shift 1350. Might be preferable and rule out some wiring headaches. I yanked the Ranger's D35 with 4.10s. But it needs bearings, balljoints and one spindle. IF I swap in the D35, I would prefer to use the 96-97 model Ranger unit, for the better brakes. I also have a D30 from a XJ with 3.07s... At stock B2 height, I think I'd have to trim a LOT of the crossmember and maybe weaken it. No real reason to SAS...

In a different vein, Are the 2WD beams for the Explorers a bolt in for B2/Ranger 4x4 mounts? Just something to consider.

Yeah, go figure, someone thinking of building a RBV for MPG...
 

Top