•  

    Click HERE to join our forum and participate in the discussions.

     

7.5" open to limited slip conversion?


CraigK

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
126
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Vehicle Year
1987
Vehicle
Ford
I have a plain vanilla 44 (Ford?/Dana?) open 7.5" 3.73 rear axle on my stock '87 Bronco II 4WD AT. I can get stuck in winter in my gently sloped driveway, and would like to upgrade to a limited slip rear end for snow and poor traction situations. I do not plan competition or intense off-road use. Cost and ease of conversion are critical. What options are available? I am new to this site, and looked in the tech sections, viewed archives, ran searches and was not able to find info on what I thought would be a common upgrade. Any insight will be appreciated. Thanks.

CraigK
 


Twizzler09

New member
U.S. Military - Veteran
1000+ Watt Stereo
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Morrison, IL
Vehicle Year
1997
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.2L/256CI V6
I'd avoid running limited slip in snow and bad weather, mainly because if your right-rear loses traction, your left-rear quits moving, which means you lose forward momentum. With snow especially, losing forward momentum when your trying to get up a driveway is a bad thing. Personally I'd go with a locker or something running positrack. I know your running 4x4, but I'd rather keep all 4 tires moving, then having one cut out, and then I lose all rear-power.

Thats my suggestion/opinion, others may feel differently about it.

Have to wait for someone else to come in though, they know more so than I do where to find decent parts and such.
 

kunar

Odd One
Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Age
36
Location
Toledo, Ohio
Vehicle Year
1987
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
I'd avoid running limited slip in snow and bad weather, mainly because if your right-rear loses traction, your left-rear quits moving, which means you lose forward momentum.
No, no, no....thats how an open diff works and thats why he has the problem he does. if you have a l/s rear, it *should* keep both rear tires spinning even if one looses traction, but only in low traction situations. on a dry road, it will allow them to spin at different speeds (think cornering) having a l/s rear over an open will be a significant improvement. i would recommend hitting up your local junkyards and looking for an entire axle assembly thats the setup you want. it is a fairly easy swap, even for the backyard mechanic, and the entire thing can be had for around $100, at least in my area. another option would be a locker, which could go in your current axle/carrier but youre gonna pay more for it and its overkill for (and actually more dangerous in) snow or rain. hope this helps...
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2001
Messages
0
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Age
62
Location
East-Central Pennsylvania
Vehicle Year
1987... sorta
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
'93 4.0
And the rear axle in an early ranger isn't a dana anything, 44 or otherwise...

The rear axle is a ford 7.5" and limited slip diffs ARE available.

Limited slip IS the same thing as "posi" (GM's name for limited slip)

what is being described as one wheel spinning is the behavior of an OPEN diff.

AD
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
508
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
California central coast
Vehicle Year
1991
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
Also FYI, a worn out limited slip diff behaves EXACTLY like an open diff.

Though it's relatively easy to rebuild these in MOST cases. On 7.5s, some gear ratios (I believe 3.73 and numerically higher) become complex, as the side gears won't come out of the carrier with the ring gear installed.
 

dirtraider

New member
Joined
Aug 29, 2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
38
Vehicle Year
1994
Vehicle
Ford
I'd avoid running limited slip in snow and bad weather, mainly because if your right-rear loses traction, your left-rear quits moving, which means you lose forward momentum. With snow especially, losing forward momentum when your trying to get up a driveway is a bad thing. Personally I'd go with a locker or something running positrack. I know your running 4x4, but I'd rather keep all 4 tires moving, then having one cut out, and then I lose all rear-power.

Thats my suggestion/opinion, others may feel differently about it.

Have to wait for someone else to come in though, they know more so than I do where to find decent parts and such.
I'd suggest you don't give your opinion when you don't know what you are talking about...

That being said, its going to be a lot more work to swap in a L/S because there are no insertable L/S's out there (opposed to an insertable locker like a lockright or something). I'd suggest you either use 4wd more, or upgrade to an 8.8 L/S axle....
 

kunar

Odd One
Forum Moderator
Supporting Member
Article Contributor
Joined
Jun 10, 2003
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Age
36
Location
Toledo, Ohio
Vehicle Year
1987
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
or upgrade to an 8.8 L/S axle....
although i do believe the only *bolt in* for his b2 is another 7.5 form a b2. fairly certain the frame is slightly narrower so spring pads will need to be moved to use an axle form a ranger. (there never were 8.8 stock in b2's was there??)
 

Twizzler09

New member
U.S. Military - Veteran
1000+ Watt Stereo
Joined
Nov 2, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
37
Location
Morrison, IL
Vehicle Year
1997
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.2L/256CI V6
dirtraider, I also stated that others are more knowledgable than I am, therefore warning him that my information may be incorrect. One more thing, dirtraider, just because I may not know as much as you or others do, doesn't meant I can't share my opinion. If someone asks a question I will answer with the knowledge I consider to be true. When I'm wrong (as I *know* I will be) everyone FEEL FREE to correct me. But please don't be a dickhead about it, theres no reason to talk down to others that are still learning.

How would you feel if you answered someone's question and then someone else comes in and calls you a retard (metaphorically speaking, of course) and tells you to quit talking? *Most* people would say the same thing as I just did. Its a free country, I'll post up what I think is true, if I'm wrong, so be it, correct my mistake, but don't be all pissy about it. I'm not a dickhead to anyone else on here, including you, so show some respect and don't talk down to me, eh? Help the newer people to learn this stuff properly, and maybe there'd be less incidents like this.

Now, back to Limited Slips.

The reason I said what I did about l/s is because the 8.8" on my Ranger is supposed to be Limited Slip, but it behaves absoluetly nothing like the "definition" says its supposed to. Under low traction conditions you say both tires are supposed to spin... mine don't. As far as I've ever known, this is how all Limited Slips run. Under any low traction condition, if my right-rear tire loses traction, the left tire quits spinning altogether, unless I'm rolling forward, and the right tire sits there and spins for eternity. Its been like that for ages, ever since I bought it, actually. You say L/S isn't supposed to do the One-Wheel-Peel, yet my L/S does nothing BUT the one-wheel, time for a rebuild/new rear-end then? Thanks for the corrections though, everyone. I wouldn't have been able to make the distinction between open and l/s otherwise.
 
Last edited:

dirtraider

New member
Joined
Aug 29, 2007
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
38
Vehicle Year
1994
Vehicle
Ford
How would you feel if you answered someone's question and then someone else comes in and calls you a retard (metaphorically speaking, of course) and tells you to quit talking?
I'd feel pretty dumb, so i'd make sure i knew what i was talking about before i said anything.

The blind leading the blind doesn't make the world go round....

Nova, it doens't "split" the power persay, it locks the axle up so they get the same...however it does ratchet around corners making it a little more driveable than a spool.

However as with insertable lockers, they allow the drive shaft to move about 15 degrees before engaging the axles, so if the truck is a standard it'll become a pain to drive.
 

CraigK

New member
Joined
Nov 17, 2007
Messages
126
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Vehicle Year
1987
Vehicle
Ford
Firstly, thank you to ALL that have replied. There seems to be a wealth of knowledge among posters on this site, and I appreciate the information and the learning.

I will probably not go to a "locker", as this just doesn't seem consistent with my 95%+ normal street driving use.

So my options appear to be:
- get a stock L/S Bronco 7.5" 3.73 axle (wrecker)
- get a stock L/S Ranger 8.8" 3.73 axle (wrecker)
(may be spring plate, shock mount and other issues?)
- get a stock open Ranger 8.8" 3.73 axle and add an after-market L/S kit
(may be spring plate, shock mount and other issues?)

Does this sound right? (No open-to-L/S kits available for the 7.5"?) The first option would likely be easiest, but I imagine these axles will be scarce.

Are the end flanges and flange bolt patterns that the brake components bolt to identical on 7.5" and 8.8", and on Bronco II and Ranger axles?

Any guidance on what I should pay for a L/S 7.5"/8.8" axle in reasonable shape?

Thank you.

CraigK
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
508
Reaction score
1
Points
0
Location
California central coast
Vehicle Year
1991
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0L
IMO, limited slips offer a nice compromise between the 100% locked locker solution and the 0% locked open solution. Having locked axles has some highly significant consequences -- it becomes much easier to break an axle because you can shock load one side, and the rear end of the vehicle will "kick out" under power (as it tries to center the drive wheel).

Limited slips do both of these to a much lesser extent.

And frankly, that in a 7.5 (from a Bronco II) is all that is necessary for street driving. He's not rock crawling.

I'd go looking for a 7.5 in the wrecking yard, with a torque wrench. Try the breakaway torque test. Put the wrench on a lugnut set for 25 ft-lbs. Have a buddy hold the other wheel. Put the transmission or (preferably) transfer case in neutral, or disconnect the driveshaft. Crank the torque wrench. Click = good. Make sure the parking brake is off....

Not only are Bronco II rears a different width; they also have different offsets in the "pumpkin."

Do make sure the replacement rear has the same gear ratio (read the axle tags or count ring gear teeth) as yours or you'll need a front pig as well to use 4WD.
 

dougs3.0L98

New member
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Vehicle Year
1998
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
3.0
my 98 ranger had an open 7.5 and i swapped in a L/S 7.5, i have 3.73 geas as well.

that extra 25% (or less cause i got my parts used) on the tire that has more traction helps out. if you flex it out it will still go to one tire spinning and one tire not moving at all but it was worth it to me. worth the money in my case.

my truck wouldn't back out of my driveway when it was wet and now it will with a lot of spinning haha.
 

Evan

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Stevens Point, WI
Vehicle Year
1991
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0 OHV
I would personally recommend a No-Slip.

EDIT: The No-Slip will be very smooth on the road and will also give you 100% power to each wheel off road.
 
Last edited:

Hahnsb2

New member
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Battle Ground WA
Vehicle Year
88-95
Vehicle
Ford-Dodge
Engine Size
4.0-5.2 Turbo
I would personally recommend a No-Slip.

EDIT: The No-Slip will be very smooth on the road and will also give you 100% power to each wheel off road.
They're not made for the 7.5...
 

Natedog

New member
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
212
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
CA
Vehicle Year
87
Vehicle
Ranger
They're not made for the 7.5...
Go get a LS out of a four cylinder Thunderbird Turbo-Coupe, Turbo Mustang or a Ranger/BII from the jy. Got mine outta TBird Turbo coupe for less than $50 and then had it rebuilt and installed with 4.10s. Put a few extra pre-load shims in the pack while you're at it. :)

EDIT: MAKG gave very good advice, unfortunately when I bought mine the coupel that I found were wore out so I had to rebuild it.
 
Last edited:

Hahnsb2

New member
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Battle Ground WA
Vehicle Year
88-95
Vehicle
Ford-Dodge
Engine Size
4.0-5.2 Turbo
Go get a LS out of a four cylinder Thunderbird Turbo-Coupe, Turbo Mustang or a Ranger/BII from the jy. Got mine outta TBird Turbo coupe for less than $50 and then had it rebuilt and installed with 4.10s. Put a few extra pre-load shims in the pack while you're at it. :)

EDIT: MAKG gave very good advice, unfortunately when I bought mine the coupel that I found were wore out so I had to rebuild it.
I was saying the No-Slip isn't made for the 7.5...
 

skippy

New member
U.S. Military - Veteran
Joined
Aug 6, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
67
Location
Georgia,USSA
Vehicle Year
1983
Vehicle
ford
Engine Size
2.8l durasparked rice killer
I was saying the No-Slip isn't made for the 7.5...
the limited slip option is and was an option on ranger 7.5 rear ends.the break away torque makg listed at 25 ft/lbs differs from my shop manual.the ford shop manual for 1983 lists the break away torque at 30 ft/pounds.fwiw.
 

Hahnsb2

New member
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Battle Ground WA
Vehicle Year
88-95
Vehicle
Ford-Dodge
Engine Size
4.0-5.2 Turbo
the limited slip option is and was an option on ranger 7.5 rear ends.the break away torque makg listed at 25 ft/lbs differs from my shop manual.the ford shop manual for 1983 lists the break away torque at 30 ft/pounds.fwiw.
Jesus, a No-slip is a LOCKER, not an LS, I know they made 7.5 LS, I had one, it sucked for wheeling.
 

Top