Recent content by kunar

Nope I don't think so, the 2.8 ones have goofy port spacing, right? The 2.9 ones are equally spaced.

the best choice IMO would be a master, slave and line from a 91-92 ranger. im running an m50d from a 93 navajo in my 1st gen ranger, and thats the hydraulics im using. i did run a 93 slave and line with a 2nd gen master for a while, it worked but the slave crapped out once a year, every year for...

hey, if its in otherwise good shape, and for a decent price, being 2wd wouldnt be a 'make it or break it' IMO. i mean, think about it, a d35 swap is inevitable anyways, so its really not any more work! :D

if i remember right, yeah. pull the whole front axle and the dummy case and replace both with the 4wd parts. seems like the bracket for the passengers side beam needs to be taken off the frame and flipped to the other side or something like that. ive never even seen under the front end of a 2wd...

even if it's 2wd, the swap to 4wd is fairly simple on b2's.

cam timing would have been my first guess. have you checked compression?

i agree the clunk is not in the tcase since the chain only drives the front. check your ujoints, slip joint and rear end.

sounds like you already figured out what you had before was an fm145, what you have now is an fm146. pretty sure they are interchangeable other than the length of drive shafts, so as long as you have a way to take care of that, you should be fine. both the fm145 and 146 use gear oil. hard to say...

Well i'm sorry i've upset you. As far as limiting your interaction to the B2 corral, it's just another forum on TRS. Same members, same info etc. This particular forum is "Bronco II & Explorer Specific" but there's nothing b2 specific about your belts, steering pump or steering gear, its all the...

I moved it. The engine swap isn't really "specific" to a b2, its no different than putting that engine in a 1st gen ranger. You should get some better input with the thread in the engine swaps forum. :icon_thumby:

specifically what size doesnt really matter, as long as it does the job. like adsm said, one goes to a vacuum port on the underside of the throttle body, the other goes to a vent on the fuel tank. both have hard lines in between, i would imagine you still have those...

this is one of those topics thats been discussed over and over and over. search, the answers are out there. either in the forums or in the tech library. if you use the "google custom search" at the top right of the page, it will search both.

take a look at this article, it shows the kind of info youre looking for. http://www.therangerstation.com/Magazine/Dec%2005/offroad.htm

you sure about that? AFAIK the 2.9 didnt get used till 86...

youre already sitting in front of the computer, get on your favorite parts store website and look up part numbers for each... :icon_thumby: