•  

    Click HERE to join our forum and participate in the discussions.

     

Re-Gearing


Robert_1967

New member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
410
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Location
White Pine, TN
Vehicle Year
1988/1989
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
302/2.9
I have a 89 BII, I haven't checked what gears are in it, but it has the Auto Trans from a 94 Explorer in it, What would be a better gear for Highway use??

My little BII calls for 205/75/15's and that is what it has, but on the interstate at 75, I'm turning a little around 3k RPM's, and I want to lower that, I know I can get 235/75/15's on the BII, and that is what the Explorer that I got the trans out of called for, but if I have to change gears, what would be a nice highway gear ???

also my speedo is only about 3 miles to fast, I had it checked by one of Tennessee finest with his radar, and then his speedo


Thanks



Robert
 


BRUTUS_T_HOG

New member
Article Contributor
Joined
Aug 26, 2008
Messages
0
Reaction score
2
Points
0
Location
Rainier, OR
Vehicle Year
89
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.3L
3.45 is good for me. not great for towing, but not BAD either. i'd say its the perfect mix of highway manners and power.

i have 195/70/14's
 

adsm08

New member
Ford Technician
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Location
Northumberland, PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
I'm running 215/75R15s with 3.45 gears and a 4.0 manual trans. I'm pulling about 3K at 75MPH too. That is pretty good if you ask me.

3.45 gears were common in the early trucks, but yours being an 89 it is about just as likely to have 3.73s. Honestly, with my 3.45s and my higher 4.0 gears I'm still pretty happy with how the truck drives on the highway and how it tows. Especially for having a used and abused 200K mile 2.9 in it.
 

Robert_1967

New member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
410
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Location
White Pine, TN
Vehicle Year
1988/1989
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
302/2.9
My wife's car has a 3.1 v6 and at 75, it is only turning 2300, and get's 30mpg on the interstate, I would like to drop my RPM's down about that far when it hits OD, I was looking for a divorce OD like I had in my Kenworth, but I can't find anyone who makes them for small trucks/BII's

To me it just sounds like that little 2.9 is turning too hard at 3k.

adsm08, it sounds like we both have the same set up, 2.9 with a 4.0 auto tranny.

Robert
 

adsm08

New member
Ford Technician
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Location
Northumberland, PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
adsm08, it sounds like we both have the same set up, 2.9 with a 4.0 auto tranny.

Robert
Difference being that the M5OD has different gears for the 2.9 and 4.0 versions. The A4LD didn't.

Also, you wife's 3.1L (presumed V6). That makes that a Chevy, probably a Malibu or Impala, thinking at leas 09+, more likely 05+, correct?

Those are FAR more aerodynamic and much lighter than you 89 B2. To get your 75MPH RPM down to 2300 you will need something in the neighborhood of 3.27 gears backed with 31 or 33 inch tires. You won't like that too far below 75.

EDIT: Ran some numbers through a calculator. 3.45s and 27" tires should net you about 2300 RPM and 71.4 MPH.

So my tires and rear end plus your OD gear should get you 2300 at 71.
 
Last edited:

Robert_1967

New member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
410
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Location
White Pine, TN
Vehicle Year
1988/1989
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
302/2.9
The wife's car is a 96 Chevy Lunamia (<-spelled wrong).

she use to be a Ford fan till she bought this car, now she is a Chevy fan, that is till she can get a New VW Beetle.

3.27 would be doable when I can trade for another Explorer, I just took the engine and trans out of a 92 Explorer to put in My 88 Ranger, and the rear is the 8.8 with a open 3.27

So when I get my Truck finished, I'll look for me another Explorer, and that should help out.


Robert
 

adsm08

New member
Ford Technician
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Location
Northumberland, PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
How far is White Pine from Nashville?

I have a set of 3.27s in a Ranger axle. I can pop the pins out, grab the center chunk, and send it down with my sister in January.
 

Robert_1967

New member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
410
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Location
White Pine, TN
Vehicle Year
1988/1989
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
302/2.9
I was just in Nashville at Vanderbilt hospital, it's some where around 200 miles.


Robert
 

adsm08

New member
Ford Technician
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Location
Northumberland, PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Hmm. that's a bit out of the way.
 

Robert_1967

New member
V8 Engine Swap
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
410
Reaction score
4
Points
0
Location
White Pine, TN
Vehicle Year
1988/1989
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
302/2.9
That's OK, right now I couldn't afford to buy new chunks any ways.

I really can't do any thing to the BII till I get my Ranger fixed, but I was just wondering what would be a good gear to try and run in the diffs, a lot of times I can't figure out the axle ratios, like is a 4.10 a taller or lower gear then 3.27 ?? and is a 3.43 a lower gear???

see, what I mean.



Robert
 

adsm08

New member
Ford Technician
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Location
Northumberland, PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
The numerically higher a gear is the lower (shorter) the actual ratio.

Say you have one truck with 3.27s and one with 5.13s, all else the same. The 3.27 truck will have slower acceleration but a higher top speed and will suck for towing. The 5.13 truck will have awesome off the line power and pull, will be a great tow rig, but will probably top out around 35 MPH with stock tires.

As for "buying" my 3.27 chunk, I can't seem to give this stupid thing away. The only reason I wouldn't give you the whole axle is because I don't think it will fit in her car. I'm also not sure that little VW 2.0 turbo will pull that thing the whole way down there.
 
Last edited:

Hahnsb2

New member
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Battle Ground WA
Vehicle Year
88-95
Vehicle
Ford-Dodge
Engine Size
4.0-5.2 Turbo
I wouldn't wish 3.27s on my worst enemy.

Leave it alone, it's right where it needs to be.
 

voodoochylde

New member
Joined
Mar 31, 2010
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Rainelle, WV
Vehicle Year
1986
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.9l
I've got an 86 BII with a 2.9L, M5OD from a 92 explorer, 3.73 open gears front and rear, and I'm running 235-70-R15 tires. I do around 2300 to 2400 at 70mph on the interstate.

Blasted thing's got no power but I think the motor just sucks. Preparing for a 4.0 swap and D35 and 8.8 this spring/summer :)
 

84bluebronco2

New member
Joined
Dec 7, 2009
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Location
Central New York
Vehicle Year
94
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
I have a 4.0 94 explorer with M5OD and 3.27s. 3.27's are obnoxious for hills and towing, but on the highway with 235/75R15's I do 2250 at 70mph.
 

adsm08

New member
Ford Technician
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Location
Northumberland, PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
I went to school with the guy I bought my 3.27 axles from. He had a 4.0, 5 speed, and 35s on those axles. It moved them, but it wasn't pretty.
 

Hahnsb2

New member
Joined
Aug 8, 2007
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
Age
35
Location
Battle Ground WA
Vehicle Year
88-95
Vehicle
Ford-Dodge
Engine Size
4.0-5.2 Turbo
I have a 4.0 94 explorer with M5OD and 3.27s. 3.27's are obnoxious for hills and towing, but on the highway with 235/75R15's I do 2250 at 70mph.
I had the same setup and hated it for everything, under 65 I got almost 2MPG better if I never used 5th and cruising 70 the mileage was crap either way. It's too damn tall.
 

4x4junkie

Mall-Rated
Forum Moderator
Joined
Aug 19, 2001
Messages
0
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Location
So. Calif (SFV)
Vehicle Year
1990,1994
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
2.9L, 4.0L
The 2.9L is perfectly fine spinning 3K at 75 MPH. I doubt there's much, if any mileage gain to be had by regearing... However you'll add probably 2-3 MPG by simply just slowing down to 60-65 MPH.

Like was mentioned, the BII is as aerodynamic as a brick. Not really all that much you can do about it.
 

adsm08

New member
Ford Technician
Joined
Sep 20, 2009
Messages
1
Reaction score
13
Points
0
Location
Northumberland, PA
Vehicle Year
1987
Vehicle
Ford
Engine Size
4.0
Yeah, and terrain will make a big difference too. I lost about 3 MPG when I move here. I moved from a fairly flat area at the southern end of the Susquehanna river valley. I now live in the northern part of the valley, which is near the Appalachians. Now I'm going up and down these stupid hills which are bigger than anything back home and considered small.

I'm hoping to get that back by going to 3.73s.
 

Top